When I am faced with an incurable condition and am of sound mind, I, along with a clear majority of Hawaii residents, want to have access to life-ending medications, whether I choose to use them or not. In medical ethics, this choice is based on the principle of autonomy.
With a six-month prognosis, I already have the autonomous choice to continue or not continue treatments, accept hospice services or not, stay at home or not. This should extend to my choice of where and when I will die with the help of medications.
Thus, my ethical right becomes my legal right, as it should. Twenty years of Death with Dignity (which Medical Aid-in-Dying is based on) in Oregon have shown no abuse and has given great comfort to individuals and families.
I am a retired nurse. I practiced in Hawaii for eight years and before that, in Oregon for 25 years, both before and after the Death with Dignity law was implemented in 1997. I have cared for many, many people during their dying process.
I always recommend hospice and palliative care to all people who have less than six months to live. Hospice has much to offer to people who are dying. We need more hospice and palliative care services available to all who have an incurable condition and are facing their end. I still am engaged in hospice as a volunteer. I see three patients every week.
However, hospice and palliative care do not meet the needs of all patients in the last six months of their life. Prior to the Death with Dignity law, I have seen much needless suffering endured by human beings as they approach their death. Sometimes pain cannot be controlled and bodily functions not regulated, causing suffering we healthy people cannot imagine.
Read the full story at the Honolulu Civil Beat
