SCA's Letter to Members of the House Judiciary Committee -- Feb. 4, 2011

February 4, 2011

Dear Representative,

The Secular Coalition for America urges you to oppose H. Con. Res. 13, a resolution that would unnecessarily reaffirm the phrase “In God We Trust” as our nation’s official motto. This resolution does not alter law in any way, thus its purpose is one of perception only. The motto is not inclusive of the beliefs of all Americans—including the millions of atheists, agnostics, humanists, freethinkers, and other nontheists represented by our Coalition, as well as the millions of other Americans whose non-Judeo-Christian beliefs do not entail the use of the word “god.”

The resolution’s passage out of the House Judiciary Committee would continue to alienate millions of Americans from their government and encroach further on the nation’s tradition of separation of church and state.

As we watch history unfold across northern Africa and the Middle East, it is wise to remember that it is our acceptance of all viewpoints and the unique plurality of our citizenry that makes our country strong. Branding our secular country with a religious motto only creates division among its citizens and erodes the wall of separation between church and state.

The phrase “In God We Trust” was adopted only in 1956 during the McCarthy Era. For a secular nation that claims to provide equality, liberty, and freedom for all, the motto means that the beliefs of theists and nontheists are not treated the same at all. “In God We Trust” does not apply to the more than 16 percent of Americans who identify themselves as atheist, agnostic, nonreligious, or unaffiliated, and it does not apply to religious Americans who do not have Judeo-Christian beliefs.

Furthermore, by “supporting and encouraging” the public display of the national motto in all public buildings, public schools, and government institutions, the resolution could create a costly and unnecessary obligation for thousands of local and state governments during a time when they have limited resources and embattled budgets.

Several points in the resolution need to be countered. For example, the phrase “In God We Trust” has not been around since our nation’s founding; it did not appear nationally until the mid-1800s and not widely until the 20th century.

Second, the Declaration of Independence does not ever mention “God,” only a “Creator,” an important word choice and difference. The Declaration, while significant and historic, is not a legal document. The Constitution is the foundational document of our government and never mentions “God.” The only references to religion in the Constitution are to prevent its use in oaths for government office, to prevent the government from establishing religion, and to protect each citizen’s right to religious freedom.

Third, while the oath of office for federal employees under 5 U.S.C section 3331 does include the sentence “So help me God,” the U.S. Constitution makes it very clear in Article VI that “no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” With that precedent in mind, perhaps Congress should revise the oath rather than waste time reaffirming a motto that excludes millions of constituents.

Fourth, and most importantly, in times of tragedy, anyone may turn to the religious deity of his or her choice if doing so provides them comfort; however, millions of Americans do not turn to God or any other deity in sorrowful times. To make a sweeping statement that “the people of the United States” turn to God is to alienate and blatantly exclude these taxpayers and constituents while favoring Judeo-Christian believers.

Finally, while the words of President John Adams are important, so are his actions. President Adams presented to the Senate and signed the Treaty of Tripoli in June 1797, which states that “the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion[.]”

Rather than wasting time on a resolution that in effect does nothing except alienate constituents and break down the wall of separation of church and state, the House Judiciary Committee should focus on protecting the rights of all U.S. citizens and the integrity of the Constitution.

Sincerely,

Sean Faircloth

Executive Director

Secular Coalition for America

seo google sıra bulucu kanun script encode decode google sira bulucu google pagerank sorgulama seo google sıra bulucu ukash kanunlar
seo google sıra bulucu kanun script encode decode google sira bulucu google pagerank sorgulama seo google sıra bulucu ukash kanunlar seo google sıra bulucu kanun script encode decode google sira bulucu google pagerank sorgulama seo google sıra bulucu ukash kanunlar